Part 1 - Don Harrold Interview - Accent Radio Networks
May 23rd, 2009 | by netwroks |donharrold asked:
www.donharrold.net Jerry Hughes interviews Don Harrold. Topics include Federal Reserve, Banks, Ben Bernanke, Money, The Depression, Parenting, Children
sitara networks
25 Responses to “Part 1 - Don Harrold Interview - Accent Radio Networks”
By Angop96 on May 24, 2009 | Reply
seranoa networks
Jeremy,
I never said that the U.S. doesn’t have it’s share of problems including hedonistic life styles. But it’s really up to an individual don’t you think to choose to do something or not to do something? You can try to take away certain freedoms and liberties, but if the demand is there…oh well. I’m not condoning it, just telling you like it is. America is still the best country in the world. Someone living in the midst of an apartheid really shouldn’t be pointing fingers.
By jeremyhattingh on May 24, 2009 | Reply
wide area network
make a valid point not spam.
By Angop96 on May 27, 2009 | Reply
food networks
Hahaha..no, Jeremy. What’s “classic” is that you respond as if you have a psychiatry or psychology degree or at best because it’s “en vogue” or you think it makes you sound so intellectual to throw a PSY-101 term around like you actually know what you’re talking about. You’re a pompous ***. Please, leave your idiotic rhetoric somewhere else.
By alexiscaine on May 30, 2009 | Reply
advantek networks
hey guys did u know that amen is a demon god?
By jeremyhattingh on Jun 2, 2009 | Reply
mesh networks
Classic Stockholm Syndrome. Its true that Africa has problems, but a starving person is no more of a disaster than a citizen oozing the toxic waste that is the modern US system of consumption. Does the US understand the global results of this hedonistic living ? There’s no feedback loop. Living is too cheap. Actually what worries me more is *********** of this thinking into the East.
By marcusguernsey on Jun 3, 2009 | Reply
network design
it will get worse before it gets better.
By Angop96 on Jun 6, 2009 | Reply
networking networks
Jeremy,
your perception or opinion of how “the rest of the world” views the U.S. is exactly how the rest of the world views you well-fed FAT CATS in an extremely under-nourished and starving continent….and sit there watching them die…nice…
By donharrold on Jun 9, 2009 | Reply
wan networks
MAXIMUMVALUES - Man, what a nut you are. I wrote that at 2 AM… But, whatever. Get a life.
By maximumvalues on Jun 9, 2009 | Reply
ad networks
i need type no more.. keyword in your response “OUR”. nevertheless, enjoy
your videos and thanks for putting them out.
By donharrold on Jun 11, 2009 | Reply
network management
MAXIMUMVALUES - What you miss is that my analogies are my own. I have no idea what you mean with our Peter Schiff comments.
By maximumvalues on Jun 13, 2009 | Reply
networking
ok, calm down. im just suggesting to find your own analogies. especially when it comes to family references. other note, many thanks for putting us on Patrick Byrne.. ive enjoyed listening to his examination of market manipulation on the deep capture blog.
By freezazoid on Jun 14, 2009 | Reply
force networks
I have to add to what I said below the I would prefer a gold/silver standard…. even if the “money changers” who own most of the gold try to **** us over be releasing a bunch of gold into the market and devalue the gold note, all they’ve done is get rid of gold that was in their hands and put it into circulation, sure the value of a gold note goes down, but there’s more of them…. same thing as splitting a stock. gold becomes more liquid and no-one gets fucked. There’s nothing they can do.
By freezazoid on Jun 16, 2009 | Reply
mesh network
I just realized printing money is irrelevant as long as the money that is printed is given to the people in forms of tax breaks or an actual check. It’s like when a stock splits, you suddenly have double the stocks but it’s irrelevant because it goes to the stock holders…. it just makes the stock more liquid. The problem is fractional reserve banking and selling US bonds to bankers at interest to print this money that goes to government purchases. even a gold standard doesn’t matter.
By lastnymleft on Jun 16, 2009 | Reply
tmobile network
“must say ive heard some of this rhetoric before. Mr Peter Schiff almost verbatim in your interview. are you going to reference him or pass this on as your own material? agree with your views but dont agree with you passing on others ideas and quotes as your own”
It’s standard Austrian school of economic thought. ANY Austrian will say similar. If you want different, talk to a Keynesian.
“especially making specific family references”
People aren’t allowed to make personal references anymore?
By sixthskinjob on Jun 18, 2009 | Reply
network cabling
Indeed.
It was once called “feudalism”, and it is alive and well…under the cloak of “capitalism”, “communism”, “socialism”, “federalism” or whatever term one chooses to apply.
The names may change, but the result is the same…your energy for their comfort.
By RevolutionaryJam on Jun 19, 2009 | Reply
networks
i actually am not talking about money you worked your *** off to make tho, as far as I’m concerned thats yours
I’m talking about money other people worked their *** off for and have to pay to extremely rich people because they are somehow meant to “own” their house
how you someone can own the house which someone else lives is a bit of a mystery to me and seems far from sane, it’s not very different from a protection racket
By jeremyhattingh on Jun 21, 2009 | Reply
network configuration
Your comments on living a “smaller life” are welcomed by us here in the third world (South Africa in this case). Imagine sitting next to a fat person on the bus, and no matter how hard you try to convince them, they keep stealing food from the kids sitting nearby. This is how the US seems to the rest of the world. **** to say it but the current situation was inevitable, and I just hope that the pain will reach the right people. If it doesnt, well then you have yourselves to blame.
By valhala56 on Jun 23, 2009 | Reply
network diagrams
Don, you are correct the dollar is backed by nothing, neither is the money in a monopoly game. All it is, is an agreed upon exchange for the game, in the case of Monopoly it’s Monoply money worthless anywhere but that game. The Dollar is accepted because the whole planet is playing this game with dollars. It’s just a big game, and right now the Chinese anD Russian own Boardwalk and Park Place, and the US is moving into Baltic Ave.
By eckhart79 on Jun 25, 2009 | Reply
atm network
userkc, This is in regard to your first statement. We are again mimicking 1920’s spending, where are country imports more than it exports. We’ve reached 76% spending as part of our GDP, and Americans reached blowing 102% of their paychecks.
You are right we only need some many people working farms, medicals, and utilities. We learned this and were forced back into manufacturing, just like in the 50’s.
A popcorn society of spending bubble induced cash can only sustain for so long.
By eckhart79 on Jun 29, 2009 | Reply
hope network
Mushy2000,
I enjoy your comments as well. You typically have the most un-insightful emotionally flaring dialog amongst the bunch.
Keep the entertainment going…
By userkc on Jul 1, 2009 | Reply
computer network support
It is a chicken and egg thing. How can people paying off debt when they have no jobs? The economy (local) has to be supported to generate jobs and incomes. The one who really need to cut spending is US government. They need to stop wasting money. Why did our elected government officials get all these benefits while people elected them kept getting burnt? Why rich people pay less tax? We need to tax rich. And tax break for the rest, more money for general public to spend.
By donharrold on Jul 2, 2009 | Reply
tellme networks
USERKC - Tell you what, when Americans have their credit cards paid off, their mortgages paid off, their car loans paid off, and, their student loans paid off, then let’s talk about all that “Retail” and “electronics” spending.
By donharrold on Jul 4, 2009 | Reply
on networks
MAXIMUMVALUES - This may surprise you. I’m 40 years old. I’ve lived a life to this point that taught me things Peter Schiff and I happen to agree on. But, hey, if the worst thing I do today is sound like Peter Schiff then you should close your eyes, enjoy the truth, and, quit bitching about it.
By maximumvalues on Jul 4, 2009 | Reply
jahi networks
Don,
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…. must say ive heard some of this rhetoric before. Mr Peter Schiff almost verbatim in your interview. are you going to reference him or pass this on as your own material? agree with your views but dont agree with you passing on others ideas and quotes as your own. especially making specific family references.. bit creepy.
By larrygene71 on Jul 5, 2009 | Reply
beamreach networks
Don, I’m going to have to start calling you “Durex” because you’re so sensative. You keep on keepin’ on, biggin’ — don’t worry about this little old YouTube rookie…..